![]() ![]() Still unrealistically spacious but hey, at least, it looks lived in. Then I remember that this drama is about as realistic as a moon made out of blue cheese… For me, him having his own office doesn’t bode well for his friendships. Inequality and subsequent jealousy is the surest way to ruin a friendship. Also, flawed humans as we are, the strongest friendships are those based on equality. This goes against what a lot of tech start-ups believe in - equality. This means that he and his friends are not on an equal footing - he is on a level above them. This detail might just be to show how awesome he is but it always irritated me. Like I said earlier, straight out of a furniture catalogue - the interior design company that sponsored this drama must be really into white furniture.Īlso, Xiao Nai is the only one to have his own office the rest work in the common space. But my main complaint is that it looks cold and impersonal. Is again unrealistically spacious and modern. Where is the mess that is endemic to college life? Also, who gives college kids white furniture? The white lighting used in the scenes (as opposed to the warm yellow lighting in the movie) also adds to the sanitised and impersonal feeling. It’s too spacious, too neat, too sanitised. Whereas the dorm room in the drama looks straight out of a furniture catalogue. These tiny details make the room looks cosy and lived in. In the movie, every inch of the dorm room is crammed with stuff - the clothes hanging at the window, the photos pasted on the cupboards, the desks teeming with books and knick-knacks. The movie sets look more realistic than the drama sets. ![]() But now that I’ve watched the movie, I can’t get over how artificial the sets for the drama look. In contrast, I felt that drama had rather generic cinematography that served its purpose but never truly wowed me.įinal Verdict: Movie wins hands down for visuals.īefore I watched the movie, I thought the sets for the drama were adequate. Watching Yixiao Naihe (一笑奈何) give Zhenshui WuXiang (真水无香) a smackdown was very satisfying. In particular, the film did a great job of blending the online and offline worlds. The director incorporated the CGI in very creative ways to push forward the plot in such a short time. ![]() I was blown away by how well thought-out many of the scenes were. Still, look at how badass Wei Wei’s character looks in the movie.īesides the gorgeous CGI, I also enjoyed the cinematography in the movie. But the lower-quality makes it look more like a real-life RPG game. ![]() The game visuals for the drama (below) aren’t as impressive as the movie’s (above). You see that huge shadowy structure in the background? It appears later in the story. The RPG game in the movie is freaking gorgeous and so detailed. Just look at how cute the beginning credits are. The movie combined impeccable CGI with good cinematography to create wonderful visuals, that for me, far outstripped those of the drama. Oh my god the CGI in the movie oh my god. Drama Case #1: Love O2O, an attempt at an “objective” breakdown of the respective virtues and flaws of the movie and drama adaptation. Presenting to you my virgin blog post - Movie vs. So which one is better? I’ve watched both (the movie and most of the drama) and I have lots of thoughts about it. It was made into a drama series starring Zheng Shuang and Yang Yang and a movie starring Angelababy and Jing Boran. Love O2O (Online 2 Offline) or One Smile is Very Alluring (Chinese name: 微微一笑很倾城) was originally a book written by famous Chinese internet novelist Gu Man (顾漫). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |